Media:
I am sick and tired of all the morons in the media who spend more time talking about Michael Jackson's plastic surgery than they do about weapons of mass destruction. When did the media become so absolutely irrelevant?

Reality:
The picture on the left is what Michael Jackson would look like if he hadn't had plastic surgery. The picture on the right is the Michael Jackson that surgery created. Needless to say, Michael Jackson's surgery is responsible for the current success of this self-made, pop icon. Face the facts, Lionel Richie look-alikes are a dime a dozen, but there is only one Michael Jackson. This is not to denegrate or to suggest that one look is better than the other --just different, and that is the only point worth illustrating --viva la difference --excuse my French.

Media pundits love to make a big deal out of Michael Jackson's plastic surgery and they keep discussing it, ad nauseum, to prove everything from the claim that Michael Jackson is weird to the claim that Michael Jackson is a liar, because everybody and his brother is supposed to be an expert regarding how many times Michael Jackson has had surgery. Who cares? When did the media turn into a bunch of ignorant, gossipy morons?

Make no mistake about it, if Michael Jackson looked like Lionel Richie, Tom Sneddon would not dare to dispute the child welfare authorities who have made it clear that Michael Jackson did not molest anybody, and that is what makes this Prosecution an Inquisition. Tom Sneddon and anybody who does not absolutely reject this travesty of justice is too weird.

The fact that Michael Jackson is criticized for the way he looks is a symptom rather than the cause. Michael Jackson is a celebrity, and this society tends to turn celebrities into images rather than into the human beings they are. Marylin Monroe put it best when she said that a kiss is worth $50,000 in hollywood, but your soul is worth fifty cents. Like Michael Jackson, Marylin Monroe was portrayed because of the way she looked, and if we listen to what she said, human beings like Michael Jackson will be treated fairly. Get the message?

Just in case you missed the point, it is far easier to believe that Tom Sneddon has molested young girls, than to credibly claim that Michael Jackson is a pedophile. The tell-tale sign of a pedophile is that he cannot control himself around children, and given the fact that Michael Jackson has entertained thousands of youngsters and the only public complaint comes from 2 boys from the same, troubled family suggests that it is not very difficult to prove extortion. And just because Tom Sneddon looks like a pervert, is it fair to suggest that he has molested young girls or to seek public assistance, to substantiate suspicion? My apologies, we are not supposed to judge people because of the way they look. Macho-man, Tom Sneddon, would not approve.

Next: The genius of Michael Jackson